design critique
your design.
evaluated clearly.
structured feedback grounded in 10 years of design practice. my methodology, powered by AI for speed. you get the evaluation in minutes, not weeks.
$75 AUD · delivered to your inbox
describe your design — paste a Figma link, screenshot URL, or a detailed written description. you'll get back a structured critique: first impression, what's working and why, hierarchy and layout issues, typography and spacing, color and contrast flags, copy alignment, and the top three priority fixes ranked by impact with concrete actions.
works for landing pages, app screens, dashboard UI, pitch decks, Figma mockups, and portfolio pieces. not a fit for brand identity systems, motion design, or multi-week sprints. no calls, no revision cycles — the intake form is designed to get signal upfront.
how it works: you submit your design and describe what you're optimizing for. i've distilled a decade of critique structure into a repeatable framework — first impression, hierarchy, typography, color, copy, and three priority fixes. the framework is mine. the speed comes from AI. you get the depth without the waiting.
example output
Brief: Landing page for a B2B project management tool. Designer's concern: "the hero feels disconnected from the features below it — like two different sites stitched together."
Understanding of the problem
The hero promises simplicity, but the features below it promise power. These are different value propositions for different buyers. The page needs to pick one.
Priority fix #1
Pick one audience and commit. Strip "enterprise-grade permissions" and "advanced reporting" — replace with small-team language. This solves the "two sites" feeling at the content level.